比尔盖茨最终定稿

比尔盖茨最终定稿3篇

　　下面是范文网小编收集的比尔盖茨最终定稿3篇，以供参考。

比尔盖茨最终定稿1

　　比尔盖茨

　　文章以比尔盖茨的一句名言开篇，引出比尔盖茨的简介，接着介绍了使他成功的一些个人品质。每段都采用了细节支持陈述的写作手法，之后用时间顺序介绍了他个人的发展史，最后予以总结。

　　我将从学习目的、预览、引入、文章大纲等方面进行文章介绍。

　　在学习目标方面，将着重于提高学生的基本技能。包括提高学生的朗读和写作能力，并关注他们的听、说方面的训练。

　　之后以图片导入的方式呈现问题“whoishe?”。比尔盖茨是微软公司的创始人，首屈一指的科技尖才，慈善家，环保人，与保罗艾伦创办微软公司，曾连续13年蝉联世界首富，曾任微软董事长、CEO首席软件设计师，并持有公司超过9%的普通股，也是公司最大的个人股东。

　　在初步了解背景知识后，在进行文章的浏览，并总结出文章的段落的划分。本篇文章可以划分为四个部分-----第一部分（1）比尔盖茨的总体介绍；第二部分（2--6）比尔盖茨的一些个人品质以及他成功的原因；第三部分（7--11）比尔盖茨的个人发展史；第四部分（12）总结部分，总结了比尔盖茨的未来希望以及听他未来的短期计划。在这一过程中，会呈现相应的问题，让学生迅速找到关键词以及答案，此目的在于锻炼学生的快速阅读能力。

　　在了解文章大意后，接着是单词的讲解。由于同学们已有相应的的知识积累，所以此部分只会进行相对重要的单词讲解。

　　最后，会以例子呈现重点短语的方式进行重点短语和句型的介绍，并带有相应的练习。首先是重点短语方面??此环节会有相应的短语区分及例子介绍；再有是重点的句型??。

比尔盖茨最终定稿2

　　比尔盖茨十句经典名言

　　一：再烦，也别忘微笑；再急，也要注意语气；

　　二：再苦，也别忘坚持；再累，也要爱自己。三：低调做人，你会一次比一次 稳健；高调做事，你会一次比一次优秀；

　　四：成功的时候不要忘记过去；失败的时候不要忘记还有未来。五：有望得到的要努力，无望得到的不介意，则无论输赢姿态都会好看。

　　六：生活不是单行线，一条路走不通，你可以转弯。

　　七：泪水和汗水的化学成分相似，但前者只能为你换来同情，后者却可以为你赢的成功。

　　八：变老是人生的必修课，变成熟是选修课。九：以锻炼为本，学会健康；以修进为本，学会求知；

　　十：以进德为本，学会做人；以适应为本，学会生存。

比尔盖茨最终定稿3

　　Graduation speech at Harvard University by Bill Gates

（2009/6/7）

　　Notice how personal and heartfelt it grabs the a good look at the speech and decide for yourself what you think are :

---the key messages

---the values the speaker is trying to put forward

---the key learning points for you

　　By taking a good look at other successful inspirational graduation speeches as well as the Bill Gates graduation speech, it hopefully will give you some ideas for your Bok, former President Rudenstine, incoming President Faust, members of the Harvard Corporation and the Board of Overseers, members of the faculty, parents, and especially, the graduates:

　　I've been waiting more than 30 years to say this: “Dad, I always told you I'd come back and get my degree.” I want to thank Harvard for this timely 'll be changing my job next year … and it will be nice to finally have a college degree on my applaud the graduates today for taking a much more direct route to your my part, I'm just happy that the Crimson has called me “Harvard's most successful dropout.” I guess that makes me valedictorian of my own special class … I did the best of everyone who I also want to be recognized as the guy who got Steve Ballmer to drop out of business 'm a bad 's why I was invited to speak at your I had spoken at your orientation, fewer of you might be here was just a phenomenal experience for life was used to sit in on lots of classes I hadn't even signed up dorm life was lived up at Radcliffe, in Currier were always lots of people in my dorm room late at night discussing things, because everyone knew I didn't worry about getting up in the 's how I came to be the leader of the anti-social clung to each other as a way of validating our rejection of all those social was a great place to were more women up there, and most of the guys were science-math combination offered me the best odds, if you know what I is where I learned the sad lesson that improving your odds doesn't guarantee of my biggest memories of Harvard came in January 1975, when I made a call from Currier House to a company in Albuquerque that had begun making the world's first personal offered to sell them worried that they would realize I was just a student in a dorm and hang up on they said: “We're not quite ready, come see us in a month,” which was a good thing, because we hadn't written the software that moment, I worked day and night on this little extra credit project that marked the end of my college education and the beginning of a remarkable journey with I remember above all about Harvard was being in the midst of so much energy and could be exhilarating, intimidating, sometimes even discouraging, but always was an amazing privilege – and though I left early, I was transformed by my years at Harvard, the friendships I made, and the ideas I worked taking a serious look back … I do have one big left Harvard with no real awareness of the awful inequities in the world – the appalling disparities of health, and wealth, and opportunity that condemn millions of people to lives of learned a lot here at Harvard about new ideas in economics and got great exposure to the advances being made in the humanity's greatest advances are not in its discoveries – but in how those discoveries are applied to reduce through democracy, strong public education, quality health care, or broad economic opportunity – reducing inequity is the highest human left campus knowing little about the millions of young people cheated out of educational opportunities here in this I knew nothing about the millions of people living in unspeakable poverty and disease in developing took me decades to find graduates came to Harvard at a different know more about the world's inequities than the classes that came your years here, I hope you've had a chance to think about how – in this age of accelerating technology – we can finally take on these inequities, and we can solve , just for the sake of discussion, that you had a few hours a week and a few dollars a month to donate to a cause – and you wanted to spend that time and money where it would have the greatest impact in saving and improving would you spend it?

　　For Melinda and for me, the challenge is the same: how can we do the most good for the greatest number with the resources we our discussions on this question, Melinda and I read an article about the millions of children who were dying every year in poor countries from diseases that we had long ago made harmless in this , malaria, pneumonia, hepatitis B, yellow disease I had never even heard of, rotavirus, was killing half a million kids each year – none of them in the United were had just assumed that if millions of children were dying and they could be saved, the world would make it a priority to discover and deliver the medicines to save it did under a dollar, there were interventions that could save lives that just weren't being you believe that every life has equal value, it's revolting to learn that some lives are seen as worth saving and others are said to ourselves: “This can't be if it is true, it deserves to be the priority of our giving.”So we began our work in the same way anyone here would begin asked: “How could the world let these children die?” The answer is simple, and market did not reward saving the lives of these children, and governments did not subsidize the children died because their mothers and their fathers had no power in the market and no voice in the you and I have can make market forces work better for the poor if we can develop a more creative capitalism – if we can stretch the reach of market forces so that more people can make a profit, or at least make a living, serving people who are suffering from the worst also can press governments around the world to spend taxpayer money in ways that better reflect the values of the people who pay the we can find approaches that meet the needs of the poor in ways that generate profits for business and votes for politicians, we will have found a sustainable way to reduce inequity in the task is can never be a conscious effort to answer this challenge will change the am optimistic that we can do this, but I talk to skeptics who claim there is no say: “Inequity has been with us since the beginning, and will be with us till the end – because people just … don't … care.” I completely believe we have more caring than we know what to do of us here in this Yard, at one time or another, have seen human tragedies that broke our hearts, and yet we did nothing – not because we didn't care, but because we didn't know what to we had known how to help, we would have barrier to change is not too little caring;it is too much turn caring into action, we need to see a problem, see a solution, and see the complexity blocks all three with the advent of the Internet and 24-hour news, it is still a complex enterprise to get people to truly see the an airplane crashes, officials immediately call a press promise to investigate, determine the cause, and prevent similar crashes in the if the officials were brutally honest, they would say: “Of all the people in the world who died today from preventable causes, one half of one percent of them were on this 're determined to do everything possible to solve the problem that took the lives of the one half of one percent.”

　　The bigger problem is not the plane crash, but the millions of preventable don't read much about these media covers what's new – and millions of people dying is nothing it stays in the background, where it's easier to even when we do see it or read about it, it's difficult to keep our eyes on the 's hard to look at suffering if the situation is so complex that we don't know how to so we look we can really see a problem, which is the first step, we come to the second step: cutting through the complexity to find a solutions is essential if we want to make the most of our we have clear and proven answers anytime an organization or individual asks “How can I help?,” then we can get action – and we can make sure that none of the caring in the world is complexity makes it hard to mark a path of action for everyone who cares — and that makes it hard for their caring to through complexity to find a solution runs through four predictable stages: determine a goal, find the highest-leverage approach, discover the ideal technology for that approach, and in the meantime, make the smartest application of the technology that you already have — whether it's something sophisticated, like a drug, or something simpler, like a AIDS epidemic offers an broad goal, of course, is to end the highest-leverage approach is ideal technology would be a vaccine that gives lifetime immunity with a single governments, drug companies, and foundations fund vaccine their work is likely to take more than a decade, so in the meantime, we have to work with what we have in hand – and the best prevention approach we have now is getting people to avoid risky that goal starts the four-step cycle is the crucial thing is to never stop thinking and working – and never do what we did with malaria and tuberculosis in the 20th century – which is to surrender to complexity and final step – after seeing the problem and finding an approach – is to measure the impact of your work and share your successes and failures so that others learn from your have to have the statistics, of have to be able to show that a program is vaccinating millions more have to be able to show a decline in the number of children dying from these is essential not just to improve the program, but also to help draw more investment from business and if you want to inspire people to participate, you have to show more than numbers;you have to convey the human impact of the work – so people can feel what saving a life means to the families remember going to Davos some years back and sitting on a global health panel that was discussing ways to save millions of !Think of the thrill of saving just one person's life – then multiply that by millions.… Yet this was the most boring panel I've ever been on – boring even I couldn't bear made that experience especially striking was that I had just come from an event where we were introducing version 13 of some piece of software, and we had people jumping and shouting with love getting people excited about software – but why can't we generate even more excitement for saving lives?

　　You can't get people excited unless you can help them see and feel the how you do that – is a complex , I'm , inequity has been with us forever, but the new tools we have to cut through complexity have not been with us are new – they can help us make the most of our caring – and that's why the future can be different from the defining and ongoing innovations of this age – biotechnology, the computer, the Internet – give us a chance we've never had before to end extreme poverty and end death from preventable years ago, George Marshall came to this commencement and announced a plan to assist the nations of post-war said: “I think one difficulty is that the problem is one of such enormous complexity that the very mass of facts presented to the public by press and radio make it exceedingly difficult for the man in the street to reach a clear appraisement of the is virtually impossible at this distance to grasp at all the real significance of the situation.”

　　Thirty years after Marshall made his address, as my class graduated without me, technology was emerging that would make the world smaller, more open, more visible, less emergence of low-cost personal computers gave rise to a powerful network that has transformed opportunities for learning and magical thing about this network is not just that it collapses distance and makes everyone your also dramatically increases the number of brilliant minds we can have working together on the same problem – and that scales up the rate of innovation to a staggering the same time, for every person in the world who has access to this technology, five people don' means many creative minds are left out of this discussion--smart people with practical intelligence and relevant experience who don't have the technology to hone their talents or contribute their ideas to the need as many people as possible to have access to this technology, because these advances are triggering a revolution in what human beings can do for one are making it possible not just for national

　　Governments, but for universities, corporations, smaller organizations, and even individuals to see problems, see approaches, and measure the impact of their efforts to address the hunger, poverty, and desperation George Marshall spoke of 60 years of the Harvard Family: Here in the Yard is one of the great collections of intellectual talent in the for?There is no question that the faculty, the alumni, the students, and the benefactors of Harvard have used their power to improve the lives of people here and around the can we do more? Can Harvard dedicate its intellect to improving the lives of people who will never even hear its name?

　　Let me make a request of the deans and the professors – the intellectual leaders here at Harvard: As you hire new faculty, award tenure, review curriculum, and determine degree requirements, please ask yourselves: Should our best minds be dedicated to solving our biggest problems? Should Harvard encourage its faculty to take on the world's worst inequities? Should Harvard students learn about the depth of global poverty … the prevalence of world hunger … the scarcity of clean water …the girls kept out of school … the children who die from diseases we can cure? Should the world's most privileged people learn about the lives of the world's least privileged? These are not rhetorical questions – you will answer with your mother, who was filled with pride the day I was admitted here – never stopped pressing me to do more for few days before my wedding, she hosted a bridal event, at which she read aloud a letter about marriage that she had written to mother was very ill with cancer at the time, but she saw one more opportunity to deliver her message, and at the close of the letter she said: “From those to whom much is given, much is expected.”

　　When you consider what those of us here in this Yard have been given – in talent, privilege, and opportunity – there is almost no limit to what the world has a right to expect from line with the promise of this age, I want to exhort each of the graduates here to take on an issue – a complex problem, a deep inequity, and become a specialist on you make it the focus of your career, that would be you don't have to do that to make an a few hours every week, you can use the growing power of the Internet to get informed, find others with the same interests, see the barriers, and find ways to cut through 't let complexity stop on the big will be one of the great experiences of your graduates are coming of age in an amazing you leave Harvard, you have technology that members of my class never have awareness of global inequity, which we did not with that awareness, you likely also have an informed conscience that will torment you if you abandon these people whose lives you could change with very little have more than we had;you must start sooner, and carry on what you know, how could you not? And I hope you will come back here to Harvard 30 years from now and reflect on what you have done with your talent and your hope you will judge yourselves not on your professional accomplishments alone, but also on how well you have addressed the world's deepest inequities … on how well you treated people a world away who have nothing in common with you but their luck.